On Sat, 14 May 2022 00:53:34 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> That a mistake to consider that as a correct behavior even based on the > amount of bugs we have. The MAXIMIZED_BOTH property was considered as a > "maximize" action, and should allow such behavior for the custom application > when the decorations are rendered by the app. You can check all that bugs and > see how many people report it and then accept, for example this one: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4976497 which shows that even Swing > is broken if setDefaultLookAndFeelDecorated is used. > > Note that this test is not for the borderless window which should cover the > full screen but specifically for the MAXIMIZED_BOTH action which expected to > maximize the window in the same way as for decorated frame. And I think this > is how it works on other platforms since the test passed there. This is why > this test created 20 years ago was not changed, it was expected that we fix > the JDK. > > I suggest to rollback this and apply the fix to JDK. You probably meant https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4737788 because 4976497 is closed as a duplicate of it. And i still think it is debatable if this behavior constitutes a bug by itself. As pointed out in 2004: "I think, there is no problem in covering taskbar after maximizing for undecorated frames. For example, Internet Explorer covers taskbar after pressing F11. I think, this is a normal behaviour. But may be we should modify documentation to describe this." So this is at beast a questionable feature that might not be implemented ever. I will not roll back this test change but i will ad the comment to the JDK-4737788 pointing out that change in behavior can warrant revisiting of this test should this bug be addressed at any point in time. There, i just did that. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8314
