On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 17:18:20 GMT, Damon Nguyen <dngu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> No, it didn't occur with "embedded" HTML. It occurred with your original >> version. I compiled the test and `PassFailJFrame` into `./build` directory >> (`javac -d ./build <java-files>` and then ran it `java -cp ./build >> HtmlTagParserTest`. Since I didn't set the `test.src` property, the HTML >> file was saved to the current directory but the class file was in another >> directory, `HtmlTagParserTest.class.getResource` pointed to a non-existent >> file. >> >> However, now with the button… clicking the button would likely generate an >> exception too. > > I'll remove the button then as it's not necessary for the test. I mainly > added it to demonstrate that HTML contents are rendering correctly. I'll make > this change and update the doc for Parser to more explicitly explain what > happens when its editable vs non-editable. It looks good overall. It started with `<script>` tag; the text in javadoc refers to other unknown or unsupported tags. Shall the test be expanded with an unknown tag? Displaying two instances of `JEditorPane` where one's editable and the other isn't could be too confusing. Only editable is enough, I guess. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7446
