On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 18:16:06 GMT, Damon Nguyen <dngu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> When a JComboBox is editable, the button segment of the combo box is 
> misaligned vertically and has a different height. This change fixes these 
> issues and adds a manual test that checks the appearance of an editable and 
> non-editable JComboBox.
> 
> One of the discussions revolving this issue is the native macOS appearance of 
> editable JComboBoxes. After looking through native macOS apps, the only one 
> found is in System Preferences > Date & Time. The problem here is that the 
> native equivalent found here uses a blue button with a single down arrow as 
> the button's symbol. The current swing implementation uses a white button 
> with an up & down arrow symbol for the button. A JRS widget button that has 
> this blue button with a single downward arrow exists but does not support 
> text fields.
> 
> As such, I believe the best fix for this issue is to mainly fix the alignment 
> and sizing issue. I looked through Apple's documentation for these UI 
> elements but editable JComboBoxes aren't specifically listed anywhere. 
> Similarly, there's barely any editable JComboBoxes used in native mac apps 
> (only the date & time). So, I don't think it's a major issue if JComboBox 
> does not exactly match the example found in Date & Time.

Changes requested by honkar (Author).

test/jdk/javax/swing/JComboBox/JComboBoxBorderTest.java line 59:

> 57: //
> 58: //            }
> 59: 

Might have missed removing commented lines

test/jdk/javax/swing/JComboBox/JComboBoxBorderTest.java line 84:

> 82:             PassFailJFrame.positionTestFrame(frame,
> 83:                     PassFailJFrame.Position.HORIZONTAL);
> 84:         });

These methods need to be changed to `addTestWindow `and `positionTestWindow` 
based on the recently integrated changes to PassFailJFrame. 
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/d9ca438d06166f153d11bb55c9ec672fc63c0e9e/test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers/PassFailJFrame.java#L294

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9473

Reply via email to