On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 21:25:11 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan <xue...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>> 
>> The sprintf is deprecated in Xcode 14 because of security concerns, and the 
>> use of it causing building failure.  The build could pass if warnings are 
>> disabled for codes that use sprintf method.  For the long run, the sprintf 
>> could be replaced with snprintf.  This patch is trying to check if snprintf 
>> could be used.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei
>
> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   update on review feedback

> With the exception of these errors in cmstypes.c
> 
> /Users/mjh/Documents/GitHub/jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/liblcms/cmstypes.c:3441:132:
>  error: parameter 'SizeOfTag' set but not used 
> [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter] void *Type_ProfileSequenceId_Read(struct 
> _cms_typehandler_struct* self, cmsIOHANDLER* io, cmsUInt32Number* nItems, 
> cmsUInt32Number SizeOfTag) ^ 
> /Users/mjh/Documents/GitHub/jdk/src/java.desktop/share/native/liblcms/cmstypes.c:5137:125:
>  error: parameter 'SizeOfTag' set but not used 
> [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter] void *Type_Dictionary_Read(struct 
> _cms_typehandler_struct* self, cmsIOHANDLER* io, cmsUInt32Number* nItems, 
> cmsUInt32Number SizeOfTag) ^ 2 errors generated.
> 
> I had seen this sometime back. The same workaround of adding?
> 
> cmsUNUSED_PARAMETER(SizeOfTag); // mjh
> 
> To the two methods, which I had noticed included elsewhere in the code, still 
> appears to work.
> 

The SizeOfTag issue was tracked with 
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8283221.

> I first noticed the sprintf issue in later releases of Xcode 13. It isn?t 
> just Xcode 14.
> 

In the [Apple Developer 
Documentation](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/kernel/1441083-sprintf),
 there is a note for sprintf, "macOS 10.12–10.13.1 Deprecated".  It looks like 
that deprecation was backported.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11115

Reply via email to