On Wed, 31 May 2023 09:47:50 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It might looks weird but it is the one which is working.
>> For example, for `{"font-size: 42px", "font-size: 22px"}`
>>
>> `value` is 0.0
>> `svalue` is 42px, 22px
>> `index` false
>> `lu.units` px
>> so if I check
>>
>>
>> return val instanceof CSS.FontSize size
>> && value == size.value
>> && index == size.index
>> && Objects.equals(lu, size.lu);
>>
>>
>>
>> it will return equals `true `even though it should not be equal which is why
>> I used `svalue`
>
> This is why you have to compare the entire value of `LengthUnit` as [I
> described
> above](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1211318063).
>
> From a quick debugging session, `"font-size: 42px"` is parsed into the
> following values:
>
>
> CSS$FontSize
> value = 0.0
> index = false
> svalue = "42px"
> lu = {CSS$LengthUnit@1594} "0 42.0"
> type = 0
> value = 42.0
> units = "px"
>
> `"font-size: 22px"` is parsed into:
>
> CSS$FontSize
> value = 0.0
> index = false
> svalue = "22px"
> lu = {CSS$LengthUnit@1594} "0 22.0"
> type = 0
> value = 22.0
> units = "px"
>
>
> So [the implementation I suggested
> today](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1211318063) for
> `FontSize.equals` and `LengthUnit.equals` handles it correctly.
>
> The one that [I suggested last
> week](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1200351364) which
> avoids implementing `LengthUnit.equals` does not work because it takes into
> account only the `units` field of the `LengthUnit` object.
OK. Thanks for the suggestion..Updated `FontSize.equals` and `LenghtUnit.equals`
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13405#discussion_r1211666980