On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:01:35 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <[email protected]> wrote:

>> There is a simple build failure after 
>> [JDK-8280982](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8280982) with older GCCs:
>> 
>> 
>> * For target support_native_java.desktop_libawt_xawt_screencast_pipewire.o:
>> In file included from 
>> /home/buildbot/worker/build-jdkX-debian9/build/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libpipewire/include/spa/buffer/buffer.h:12:0,
>>                  from 
>> /home/buildbot/worker/build-jdkX-debian9/build/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libpipewire/include/pipewire/stream.h:171,
>>                  from 
>> /home/buildbot/worker/build-jdkX-debian9/build/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/screencast_pipewire.h:36,
>>                  from 
>> /home/buildbot/worker/build-jdkX-debian9/build/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/screencast_pipewire.c:33:
>> /home/buildbot/worker/build-jdkX-debian9/build/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libpipewire/include/spa/utils/defs.h:61:24:
>>  error: "__clang_major__" is not defined [-Werror=undef]
>>  #elif __GNUC__ >= 7 || __clang_major__ >= 10
>>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 
>> 
>> There is an obvious fix for this: we need to check for `defined(__GNUC__)` 
>> explicitly before touching `__clang_major__`.
>> 
>> (Yes, GCC 6 is old; but we would like to make sure it builds until we run 
>> into hard to resolve build issues. This allows modern JDKs to be built in 
>> legacy enterprise environments for e.g. portable builds.)
>> 
>> Additional testing:
>>  - [x] Linux GCC 6 fastdebug build (passes with HarfBuzz warnings, to be 
>> fixed separately)
>
> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Disable the warnings instead

Yeah, we can just ignore the warnings. See new commit. I don't see a clean way 
to disable this only for specific GCC versions, and other warnings seem to be 
added without version checks too. I checked it still builds fine on GCC 6.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14995#issuecomment-1654259008

Reply via email to