On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:04:05 GMT, ScientificWare <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> > What purpose does this distinction serve? >>> >>> Definitely an application developer and because it's the context of this >>> HTML implementation, may I preserve this distinction ? >> >> Okay, let it be. However, I still think it's not the right thing. >> >> There was nothing else but the `src` attribute, now there is. >> >>> > This actually raises another question: what if altAtt isn't provided? >>> > Should it fallback to srcURL? >>> >>> Yes, it's a logical error on my part. >> >> Are you going to address it? > >  > > > > <html> > <body> > <input type=image name=point > src="file:oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> > <p> > <input type=image name=point > src="file:oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> > <p> > <input type=image name=point > src="file:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> > <p> > <input type=image name=point > src="file:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> > <p> > <input type=image name=point > src="files:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg" alt="Logo Oracle JPG"> > <p> > <input type=image name=point > src="files:none_oracle_logo_50x50.jpg"> > <p> > </body> > </html> > > > - Left before the Patch > - Right with your suggestion and if the distinction is preserved. Yes, that's what I meant. A button with the plain source is better than a button without a title at all. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15319#discussion_r1370710100
