On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:04:16 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> The ClipShapeTest test is split into 4 different tests which could be 
>> executed in parallel.
>> 
>> The execution time is changed from:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR 
>>   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java
>>                                                          1     1     0     0 
>>   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>> 
>> Finished building target 'run-test' in configuration 
>> 'macosx-aarch64-server-release'
>> 
>> real 2m58.673s
>> user 3m8.847s
>> sys  0m11.845s
>> 
>> 
>> to:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR 
>>   
>>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java
>>                                                          4     4     0     0 
>>   
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>> 
>> Finished building target 'run-test' in configuration 
>> 'macosx-aarch64-server-release'
>> 
>> real 1m17.752s
>> user 3m25.308s
>> sys  0m12.987s
>
> Sergey Bylokhov has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update ClipShapeTest.java

Marked as reviewed by aivanov (Reviewer).

I ran the test in our CI and I didn't notice an improvement. On the other hand, 
having separate test ids is more flexible.

test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java line 88:

> 86:  * fill modes (EO rules) for paths made of either 9 lines, 4 quads, 2 
> cubics
> 87:  * (random)
> 88:  * Note: Use the argument -slow to run more intensive tests (too much 
> time)

Suggestion:

 * <p>
 * Note: Use the argument {@code -slow} to run more intensive tests (too much 
time)

Adding <p> will render the note in a new paragraph when viewed in IDE (or on 
class name hover).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#pullrequestreview-1869871294
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#issuecomment-1933856473
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#discussion_r1482797972

Reply via email to