On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:09:43 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> It's a good question. >> >> We can't do it because `ConvertAction` is not public. In fact, `B`, `FONT`, >> `I`, `STRIKE`, `SUB`, `SUP`, `U` use `ConvertAction` instead of the >> specified `CharacterAction`. >> >> The bigger problem is that `ConvertAction` does not extend >> `CharacterAction`, which means the implementation is different from what is >> specified. It is the result of >> [JDK-4171509](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4171509). >> >> There are a few more inconsistencies between the table and the real >> implementation. There are also references to non-public action classes, such >> as `TitleAction`, `LinkAction`… > > Probably we can do away with those tags which mention internal class OR > mention the public action instead, like TagAction instead of ConvertAction > HiddenAction instead of TitleAction etc I agree we should do something about it. I think `ConvertAction` can be subclass of `CharacterAction`, then the listed actions in the table will be more inline with the implementation. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17659#discussion_r1486014149
