On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 05:52:46 GMT, vtstydev <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: > More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, > PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows > platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 56c50841 Author: vtstydev <vtsty....@gmail.com> Committer: Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/56c50841ee1d4382203e200e9b9c803ee6021097 Stats: 242 lines in 2 files changed: 238 ins; 0 del; 4 mod 8307246: Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values Reviewed-by: prr, psadhukhan, aivanov ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030