On 7/15/24 5:11 PM, Daniel Gredler wrote:
Hi Phil,

Thank you for the response and the insights!

I have to admit I don't know much about the situation in macOS, but I assume they're moving things in a direction that works best for their particular situation (complete control over both the software and hardware stacks, and best-in-class displays).

I have indeed experimented with VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_GASP, and I have two problems with this "font knows best" approach:

1. You're not actually trusting the font to know best. For example, the Google Noto Sans Condensed Bold "gasp" table contains a single entry indicating that grid-fitting (i.e. hinting) and grayscale rendering (i.e. anti-aliasing) should both always be used, at all sizes. However, when I use this font in Java with VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_GASP and VALUE_FRACTIONALMETRICS_ON, Java correctly trusts the font regarding AA and enables it, but then ignores the font regarding hinting (because currently AA + FM = no hinting, and everything else is hinted, regardless of what "gasp" says).

It crossed my mind that I wasn't sure if we do the right thing in this case - the decision to use AA may be seen by the impl in a way that it can't tell the origin. This would not be a reason to add a new font hinting RenderingHint, it would just be a bug.
The hinting should only be off if FM=ON and AA=ON (not GASP).
And it also shows that the more ways you have to ask for the same thing, then the more you have to figure out a sensible answer if two are specified .. I am not sure it would ever make sense to specify GASP with ANY value of the proposed new hint but you wouldn't be
able to stop people doing it.


2. The font doesn't actually always know best. The application developer knows whether they are creating documents to be printed (and if so, whether they are intended to be printed on low-DPI or high-DPI devices), whether they are creating a desktop application with text animation and scaling (like a dynamic reporting dashboard or a videogame), whether they are creating a desktop application with static text (like a PDF viewer), etc. The developer may want to use one font for all of these use cases, but with different rendering hints.

if you are creating documents to be printed (which is really just another hidpi destination like a retina screen) hinting is OFF whether you ask for it to be ON or not, because there simply won't be hints in the font for that scale. The GASP table for example will typically indicate hinting off above something like 24 pixel size. But if you are drawing them to the screen to proof for the printer you still don't want the rendering to be awful, and that's what you will
get. Really you just want it laid out properly.
This is the use case for FM because otherwise text is laid out snapped to screen pixels which means it won't scale on a printer.

So my view is this new hint is not needed and potentially introduces difficult to answer questions.

-phil.


Interestingly, in addition to the three key values that I had proposed (VALUE_FONT_HINTING_DEFAULT, VALUE_FONT_HINTING_ON, VALUE_FONT_HINTING_OFF), I had actually considered a fourth: VALUE_FONT_HINTING_GASP. I didn't include it originally because I think the direct control over font hinting is most valuable, but it does make for a nice parallel with VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_GASP, and the combination would enable a real "font knows best" mode.

Let me know what you think about these two points and the idea of a fourth hinting option.

Take care,

Daniel



On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 9:22 PM Philip Race <[email protected]> wrote:



    Platforms are tending towards AA+unhinted - this is all we can get
    from
    macOS today so I'm not sure how well we could support this hint.

    And being able to turn off hinting when doing modes such as B&W is
    unlikely to produce good results on any font you'd want to use.

    Have you looked at the existing VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_GASP hint ?

    
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.desktop/java/awt/RenderingHints.html#VALUE_TEXT_ANTIALIAS_GASP

    it uses the OpenType table
    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/gasp
    which basically tells the rasteriser at a specific size which
    combination of hinting and anti-aliasing to use.

    If apps use together with the FM hint they should get most of what
    they
    want.
    Where JDK can (this means when we use freetype) you'd get FM PLUS the
    appropriate AA PLUS the appropriate hinting choice

    I think this is better than a hint where an app will have to guess,
    probably wrongly.

    -phil.


    On 7/14/24 7:15 AM, Daniel Gredler wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > We've had a bit of back-and-forth regarding whether font hinting is
    > enabled or disabled when drawing grayscale text with
    anti-aliasing and
    > fractional metrics enabled [1, 2]. Setting AA + FM disabled font
    > hinting in JDK 8 - 10, then JDK 11 changed this so that AA + FM
    would
    > *not* disable hinting, and finally the behavior was reverted in
    JDK 14
    > (and backported to JDK 11).
    >
    > Generalizing a bit, the current behavior (AA + FM disables
    hinting) is
    > optimal for "the desktop use case" (JavaFX, animations, smooth
    > scaling, etc). The JDK 11/12/13 behavior was optimal for "the
    backend
    > use case" (individual image creation, no animations).
    >
    > I think it would be useful to have a new java.awt.RenderingHints
    key
    > named RenderingHints.KEY_FONT_HINTING, with the following
    possible values:
    > - RenderingHints.VALUE_FONT_HINTING_DEFAULT: current behavior,
    > dictated by AA + FM
    > - RenderingHints.VALUE_FONT_HINTING_ON: enable font hinting,
    > regardless of AA + FM
    > - RenderingHints.VALUE_FONT_HINTING_OFF: disable font hinting,
    > regardless of AA + FM
    >
    > This new rendering hint would allow direct control over whether
    font
    > hinting is enabled or not, and would specifically enable the use
    of AA
    > + FM + font hints in Java.
    >
    > I'm happy to create a patch with this feature (I have a signed
    OCA on
    > file), but wanted to get feedback on the idea first. Let me know
    what
    > you think!
    >
    > Take care,
    >
    > Daniel
    >
    > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8214481
    > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8242285
    >

Reply via email to