On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 23:12:44 GMT, Damon Nguyen <dngu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Previously in [JDK-8282772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8282772), 
> there was a fix for JButtons with HTML content alignment for non-MacOS L&Fs. 
> This fix was to make other L&Fs in line with the Aqua fix found in 
> [JDK-8015854](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8015854).
> 
> However, the non-MacOS L&F fix caused a regression and the details and 
> original discussion can be found in 
> [JDK-8318590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8318590). This non-MacOS 
> L&F fix was backed out and the current behavior for JButtons with HTML 
> content for these L&Fs was deemed to be correct as is.
> 
> Through discussion, a note about Metal's different margin values should be 
> added somewhere for future reference. Metal's horizontal margins are 14 where 
> other L&Fs are zero or some small value. This discrepancy is what caused the 
> original issue to be filed. This change is to add a comment to 
> `MetalLookAndFeel.java` since there is no exact spot where these values are 
> set for the margin. It's been added where other Metal components (CheckBox, 
> RadioButton, etc.) have comments on margins as well.
> 
> Here are some L&F values for reference/comparison:
> 
> Metal's margins: [top=2,left=14,bottom=2,right=14]
> Aqua's margins: [top=0,left=2,bottom=0,right=2]
> Motif's margins: [top=2,left=4,bottom=2,right=4]
> Nimbus's margins: [top=0,left=0,bottom=0,right=0]

I've no objections from adding a comment in the code. However, the comment 
looks as if hanging in the air. There are `CheckBox.totalInsets` and 
`RadioButton.totalInsets` but there's no similar property for `Button`.

As for me, *“Doc change”* implies javadoc, but it is not the case. You're add a 
regular code comment which no one sees, except for developers.

The subject has be clearer in this respect. Like “Comment about difference” or 
“Note about difference…”, to avoid any confusion.

-------------

Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20482#pullrequestreview-2225892906

Reply via email to