On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:47:37 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> If you prefer, we can continue to explore whether or not to fix this in AWT >>> in addition to or instead of the AWT fix. >> >> typo: I meant "...in addition to or instead of the FX fix." > > I am starting to think it best to do both of these. It will improve interop > of both toolkits with other toolkits, besides each other, and you get the > problem fixed no matter whether you have a fixed JDK or a fixed FX. That makes sense to me. I sent a quick (definitely not finished) prototype of the idea I mentioned to @prsadhuk offline, so maybe he can take that as a starting point for the fix. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20688#discussion_r1731913130
