On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:09:43 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Harshitha Onkar has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> removed redundant frame.setLocation() > > test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 468: > >> 466: java/awt/Dialog/MakeWindowAlwaysOnTop/MakeWindowAlwaysOnTop.java >> 8266243 macosx-aarch64 >> 467: java/awt/dnd/BadSerializationTest/BadSerializationTest.java 8277817 >> linux-x64,windows-x64 >> 468: java/awt/dnd/DragSourceMotionListenerTest.java 8225131 windows-all > > `DragSourceMotionListenerTest` passes for me on Windows. Does it need to be > problem-listed? It passes on windows. I'm checking with the updated changes and running it multiple times to check for any intermittent issues. > test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 469: > >> 467: java/awt/dnd/BadSerializationTest/BadSerializationTest.java 8277817 >> linux-x64,windows-x64 >> 468: java/awt/dnd/DragSourceMotionListenerTest.java 8225131 windows-all >> 469: java/awt/dnd/RejectDragTest.java 7124259 macosx-all > > I wonder if `RejectDragTest` still fails on macOS. Latest comment in > [JDK-7124259](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7124259) is dated February > 2020. The problem could be fixed by now. Missed seeing this one among the review comments. It still fails on macOS. > test/jdk/ProblemList.txt line 470: > >> 468: java/awt/dnd/DragSourceMotionListenerTest.java 8225131 windows-all >> 469: java/awt/dnd/RejectDragTest.java 7124259 macosx-all >> 470: java/awt/dnd/DnDHTMLToOutlookTest/DnDHTMLToOutlookTest.java 8027424 >> generic-all > > DnDHTMLToOutlookTest passes for me with Mozilla Thunderbird 128.2.3 as well > as with Microsoft Word and Outlook version 2302 on Windows. > > I haven't tested on Linux or macOS. DnDHTMLToOutlookTest DnD => Thunderbird failed on linux for @azvegint . So I kept it problemlisted to investigate it later. This test was originally problemlisted on all platforms due to DnD HTML copy over to Thunderbird. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21213#discussion_r1786638530 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21213#discussion_r1786638195 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21213#discussion_r1786638056
