On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:50:03 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <hon...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
> 
> Following changes were made.
> 
> -  Test instructions updated
> -  BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
> -  setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedImagesToDialog btns added 
> to the frame.
> -  other minor cleanups

test/jdk/java/awt/Dialog/FileDialogIconTest/FileDialogIconTest.java line 45:

> 43:  * @summary Test to verify that PIT File Dialog icon not matching with
> 44:  *          the new java icon (frame Icon) - PIT build
> 45:  * @requires (os.family == "windows")

The original test was created to check if the Frame and FileDialog icons match 
- [JDK-6425126](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6425126)

There are some things that are not clear about the expected behavior for 
FileDialog icons.

- At present the FileDialog inherits the Frame icon (owner window) and does not 
change when the icon is explicit set to dialog using 
`dialog.setIconImage()/.setIconImages()`

- The JavaDoc for setIconImage() states - _"Ownerless windows with no icon 
specified use platform-default icon. The icon of an owned window may be 
inherited from the owner **unless explicitly overridden**."_
  
- In the test, the FileDialog  icon is overridden but it still inherits the 
owner window icon (Frame).  This is because the WindowPeer is null in case of 
FileDialog, thus updateIconImage() is not executed (updateIconImage() is not 
overriden in WFileDialogPeer). Is this the expected behavior?
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/f0ea38b3874ac627766768cbcd13f4be68c53797/src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Window.java#L674C1-L677C10

- There is also the question of additional buttons in the test that are meant 
to explicitly set icons to the FileDialog (but don't work). FileDialog icon 
gets updated only works when the Frame icon is updated (owner) and then Dialog 
is opened (via Load/Save/Simple dialog btn).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23523#discussion_r1947147492

Reply via email to