On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 03:40:05 GMT, Jeremy Wood <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I do not have much background in LZW compression or in C, but I'm reasonably > confident this resolves the problem I'm observing. It looks like the > GifImageDecoder was not always correctly handling compression codes after the > table reached its limit of ~4096. If anyone has suggestions for improvements > I'm happy to make adjustments. > > Luckily while debugging this: I was able to compare the flawed implementation > (GifImageDecoder) with ImageIO's implementation (GIFImageReader) to help > identify how the suffix/prefix tables are supposed to work. > > ImageIO's implementation may have suffered a similar bug (maybe > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7131823 ?), and that appears to have been > backported. > > I have dozens of additional test cases for this problem, but unfortunately I > don't have the rights to commit them to the OpenJDK repo. Feel free to email > me for additional context/test cases. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24271
