On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 05:45:43 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> We call AWT_UNLOCK in awt_Robot.c, gtk3_interface.c, awt_GraphicsEnv.c >>> where there's no ExceptionCheck after the call. >> >> Neither awt_Robot.c nor gtk3_interface.c calls any JNI functions afterwards. >> the awt_GraphicsEnv.c case doesn't call JNI functions between `AWT_LOCK` / >> `AWT_UNLOCK` (see explanation below about false positive). >> >>> Normally we do ExceptionCheck after GetStringUTFChars >> >> I added it just in case, but the GetStringUTFChars >> [documentation](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/specs/jni/functions.html#getstringutfchars) >> doesn't mention any exceptions being thrown. >> >>> Did you verify the warning goes off only by this PR change? >> >> it is the only reported line by the tool: >> >> `JNI exception pending in >> Java_sun_awt_screencast_ScreencastHelper_remoteDesktopKeyImpl of >> screencast_pipewire.c:1214` >> >> so it should resolve the issue. >> >> But now I think it might be a false positive: >> >> 1. `AWT_LOCK()` clears all exceptions: >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/78a392aa3b0cda52cfacfa15250fa61010519424/src/java.desktop/unix/native/common/awt/awt.h#L86-L95 >> 2. `awt_getX11KeySym` doesn't call JNI at all >> 3. `AWT_UNLOCK()` also clears an exception, and rethrows a previously >> pending exception, if any. >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/78a392aa3b0cda52cfacfa15250fa61010519424/src/java.desktop/unix/native/common/awt/awt.h#L97-L110 >> >> Since neither 1. nor 2. produces an exception, no exception will be thrown. > > 3 rethrows the exception, maybe tool is complaining about that..maybe we > should find out what that exception is and who is throwing? > Should we call EXCEPTION_CHECK_DESCRIBE instead to find out what exception it > is complaining about by running the tool? > > Also, dont we need to do ExceptionClear too in addition to ExcepionCheck to > clear out the exception else it will keep it pending? I don't think so. Let Java catch it. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25605#discussion_r2125723089