On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:20:14 GMT, Manukumar V S <[email protected]> wrote:
> Issue:
> MyanmarTextTest.java produces a false positive result when some of the test
> preconditions are not met. It checks whether certain fonts are present in the
> system, for example, 'Padauk' on Linux. If the required font is missing, the
> test simply returns early, and the test ends up passing, which is incorrect.
> Ideally, it should throw a jtreg.SkippedException when the necessary
> preconditions are not satisfied.
>
> Another scenario is that the test passes on headless machines even though it
> creates GUI components. Ideally, when GUI components are created in code
> running on a headless machine, a HeadlessException should be thrown. However,
> since MyanmarTextTest.java exits before reaching the point where the GUI is
> created (due to unmet preconditions), it incorrectly reports a pass. This
> behavior may lead to a misinterpretation of the test as being headless, which
> it is not.
>
> Fix:
> Need to throw jtreg.SkippedException in cases where some pre-conditions for
> running the test are not met.
>
> Testing:
> Tested using mach5 in all available platforms and got full PASS.
Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).
test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/MyanmarTextTest.java line 58:
> 56: private static final String FONT_LINUX = "Padauk";
> 57: private static final String FONT_MACOS = "Myanmar MN";
> 58: private static final String osName =
> System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase();
I would put this above the font names, and a blank line before and after its
declaration.
test/jdk/java/awt/font/TextLayout/MyanmarTextTest.java line 69:
> 67: if (FONT_NAME == null) {
> 68: System.err.println("Unsupported OS: exiting");
> 69: throw new SkippedException("Unsupported OS: "+osName);
Suggestion:
throw new SkippedException("Unsupported OS: " + osName);
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25879#pullrequestreview-2940248798
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25879#discussion_r2155225389
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25879#discussion_r2155225704
