On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 18:34:32 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Should each constructor specify how the message returned by `getMessage` is
> constructed instead of _directing to the specification of `getMessage` for
> details_?
100% no. I am not wasting time on that. This whole spec. is getting revamped
again in JDK 26 in very short order after this minimal fix is backported to JDK
25
> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/HeadlessException.java line 56:
>
>> 54: * For such {@code HeadlessException} the default headless error
>> message
>> 55: * may be auto-generated for some platforms.
>> 56: * The text of the default headless message may depend on
>
> This doesn't align, the following text has to be modified too.
>
> The first sentence of the second paragraph, “For such `{@code
> HeadlessException}` the default headless error message may be auto-generated
> for some platforms,” should be replaced with the slightly edited text from
> the `HeadlessException(String)` constructor: “For some platforms, the `{@code
> null}` detail message may be replaced with the default headless error
> message.”
I don't see why.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25881#issuecomment-2985884731
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25881#discussion_r2155631076
