On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 03:13:13 GMT, Damon Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:

>> In the scenario where AWT's UNLOCK API encounters a pendingException, the 
>> env pointer throws the pendingException (as seen in `awt.h`). However, in 
>> `Java_sun_awt_X11GraphicsDevice_pGetBounds`, after `AWT_UNLOCK`, the bounds 
>> var is set. The exception check does not occur until after the bounds is 
>> set, so the bounds may be set to an undesired value. This fix adds another 
>> exception check to look for this pendingException after `AWT_UNLOCK`.
>
> Damon Nguyen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Change fix to return NULLs instead.

Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).

src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_GraphicsEnv.c line 1273:

> 1271:                         return NULL;
> 1272:                     }
> 1273:                     XFree(xinInfo);

Shouldn't we call `XFree` before returning here?

src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_GraphicsEnv.c line 1273:

> 1271:                         return NULL;
> 1272:                     }
> 1273:                     XFree(xinInfo);

Shouldn't we call XFree before returning here?
Suggestion:

                    XFree(xinInfo);
                    if (!bounds) {
                        return NULL;
                    }

src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_GraphicsEnv.c line 1294:

> 1292: 
> 1293:             bounds = (*env)->NewObject(env, clazz, mid, 0, 0,
> 1294:                                     xwa.width, xwa.height);

I'm for reverting this change. The existing formatting was consistent in 
indenting wrapped lines by 8 spaces. The new formatting doesn't stick to either 
style: not 8 spaces, nor aligned to the opening parenthesis. The former is used 
in the file, see lines 1289–1290.

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27110#pullrequestreview-3236069789
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27110#discussion_r2356634195
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27110#discussion_r2356640619
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27110#discussion_r2356647179

Reply via email to