On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 14:06:01 GMT, Julian Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm back to trying to work on the JDK now. Should this issue depend on > 8348872 and 8348876? Hopefully those can be fixed soon Perhaps. With these issues resolved — [JDK-8348872](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348872 "jabswitch.cpp: regEnable and regDeleteValue leak reallocated data buffer") and [JDK-8348876](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348876 "jabswitch.cpp: regEnable and regDeleteValue leak newStr") — it could easier to clean up the code further. I don't mind if you take over these issues. I haven't got time to look at the issues since I submitted them. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21656#discussion_r2491444771
