On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 20:10:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> After reading about fputs, I think this is best. Like you mentioned, no >> ambiguity since it does not use specifiers. Updated. > >> A similar pattern is used elsewhere in this file. And I don't want this fix >> to become a reworking of this code, because that isn't a goal here. > > Indeed, it is. > > I agree it's better to keep the code consistent. > > At the same time, I think it's worth submitting a bug to simplify usages like > that, `fputs` works perfectly for strings that don't require formatting. Since Damon already made the change and its just one line I'm fine to keep it but not go looking for more. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28950#discussion_r2644188965
