On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 17:26:36 GMT, Jeremy Wood <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 4197755 is marked as a duplicate of >> [JDK-8176501](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8176501) , but I think >> that is a mistake. The complaint in that ticket still reproduces, and it is >> resolved in this PR. >> >> The complaint is: Arc2D.getBounds() is too large. If an Arc2D represents a >> small slice of an ellipse, then Arc2D.getBounds() always returns the size of >> the total ellipse. Arc2D.getBounds2D(), by contrast, has been >> "high-precision" for decades. >> >> This PR makes Arc2D.getBounds() resemble the same implementation already >> used in Area, CubicCurve2D, Line2D, Path2D, and QuadCurve2D: >> >> public Rectangle getBounds() { >> return getBounds2D().getBounds(); >> } >> >> >> This modifies (simplifies) the javadoc for Arc2D.getBounds2D(). If we >> generally like this PR I assume we'll need a CSR to approve the javadoc >> change. > > Jeremy Wood has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > 4197755: use directed inherit with getBounds() > > This is in response to darcy's comment: > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8374859 Marked as reviewed by prr (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26715#pullrequestreview-3741749638
