On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 01:30:06 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> [JDK-8348760](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348760) fixed an issue in 
> Windows L&F JMenuItem layout whereby radio bullet/checkmark was rendered in 
> different columnspace than menuitem imageicon so radiobullet/checkmark is 
> rendered in first column and imageicon is rendered in 2nd column but this 
> rendering of imageicon in 2nd columnspace was done invariably for all 
> JMenuItem irrespective of if it is JRadioButtonMenuItem or JCheckBoxMenuItem 
> or JMenuItem, which is wrong.
> 
> Normal JMenuItem (which are not JRadioButtonMenuItem or JCheckBoxMenuItem) 
> imageicon rendering should be done in first columnspace as was done before 
> JDK-8348760 fix because there is no radiobullet/checkmark to render for those 
> menuitems so no need to reserve columnspace for those bullet/checkmark icon
> 
> Before fix
> 
> <img width="205" height="127" alt="image" 
> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/13a1e352-5e8d-4251-b7a7-032935eab74e";
>  />
> 
> 
> After fix
> 
> <img width="195" height="131" alt="image" 
> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/84ec3ee6-2823-4bf7-840d-b53f2e9d44c3";
>  />

I don't have review permissions, but I'd like to comment on something that 
caught my eye.

The following image is a screenshot of the test 
`test/jdk/javax/swing/JMenuItem/TestRadioAndCheckMenuItemWithIcon.java` that 
was added by [JDK-8348760](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348760).

Before
<img width="250" height="248" alt="before" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/51c44938-bf61-44f0-a6fe-f5cf6b05a2c3";
 />

After
<img width="248" height="247" alt="after" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5d01603-3bc7-4f4b-a538-20fcb13e74d9";
 />

Before this change, the left edges of all the red squares are aligned, and the 
text of each menu item is also left-aligned.
However, after this change, for menu items without radio buttons or checkboxes, 
the red squares and the text are misaligned compared to the others.
Is this an expected behavioral change introduced by this fix?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29730#issuecomment-3913870880

Reply via email to