On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 02:30:36 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> Aqua classes for text components enables dragEnabled by default although 
>> setDragEnabled spec cites `"The default value of the dragEnabled property is 
>> false. "` and there is nothing in Aqua L&F that mentions otherwise as to why 
>> the default is overridden.
>> Other L&F dont override the mode and the code is there from macosx port days 
>> so it seems to be an oversight.
>> 
>> The code is deleted.
>> Test is added to check 
>>  - default value is honoured in all installed L&Fs
>>  - explicit application setting of drag mode is preserved on L&F change
>> 
>>  CI testing is ok.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Prasanta Sadhukhan has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Review comment

src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/JComponent.java line 4200:

> 4198:             var accessor = SwingAccessor.getJTextComponentAccessor();
> 4199:             if (!accessor.isDragEnabledSet(textComponent)) {
> 4200:                 accessor.setDragEnabledUIResource(textComponent,

This line may cause undocumented headless exception in public 
LookAndFeel.installProperty() method?

test/jdk/javax/swing/text/JTextComponent/TextComponentDragEnabledTest.java line 
94:

> 92:             for (UIManager.LookAndFeelInfo laf :
> 93:                 UIManager.getInstalledLookAndFeels()) {
> 94:                 UIManager.setLookAndFeel(new MetalLookAndFeel());

Why is it necessary to set new MetalLookAndFeel() here? Is the goal to check 
the transition from all installed L&Fs one by one, or the transition from 
MetalLookAndFeel to other L&Fs?

It will be good to test serialization patched in the last commit as well.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32101#discussion_r3738368557
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32101#discussion_r3738349071

Reply via email to