On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:25:47 GMT, Phil Race <[email protected]> wrote:

>> SplashDecodeGif() uses gif->SBackGroundColor as an index into 
>> colorMap->Colors when handling GIF_DISPOSE_BACKGND.
>> 
>> The background colour index is read from the GIF Logical Screen Descriptor 
>> and may contain a value from 0 to 255. The value is not validated against 
>> colorMap->ColorCount before indexing the colour table. A malformed GIF with 
>> a small colour table and an out-of-range SBackGroundColor can therefore 
>> cause an out-of-bounds heap read.
>> 
>> For example, a GIF with a colour table containing two entries and 
>> SBackGroundColor = 255 causes colorMap->Colors[255] to be accessed. The 
>> resulting colour value is subsequently used to fill the disposed frame 
>> background, exposing adjacent heap contents in the rendered splash image.
>> 
>> Add a bounds check ensuring SBackGroundColor is within ColorCount before 
>> indexing the colour table.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> src/java.desktop/share/native/libsplashscreen/splashscreen_gif.c line 285:
> 
>> 283:                     colorMap->Colors &&
>> 284:                     transparentColor < 0 &&
>> 285:                     gif->SBackGroundColor < colorMap->ColorCount) {
> 
> Looks like gif->SBackGroundColor originated from an unsigned char, so we 
> should not need to check for < 0 .. so this should be OK.
> 
> Don't we need a test for this ? It may not crash reliably, but a gif with a 
> small colormap size and invalid b/g color might occasionally do so .. 
> 
> You'd have to create the GIF from scratch, one taken from somewhere else and 
> edited would not pass the OCA rules. Also don't use AI to generate it (!) 
> that would also be against the rules.

Can I create two GIFs a valid one and a malformed one, using helper classes, 
and use them as test input?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33145#discussion_r4152999281

Reply via email to