Heh, yeah I don't intend to add anything directly to Om for this, just interested in the types of solutions people come up with. Om is pretty tiny and I'd like to keep it that way.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Moritz Ulrich <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:37 AM, David Nolen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Haven't thought it through but synchronization between client/server is > > definitely something I'm interested in. > > Hopefully not for Om! :) I don't think Om should handle that sort of > stuff - It might easily grow into a monolithic framework if not being > careful. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
