On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 10:45:42 PM UTC-5, Michael Zazzali wrote: > I considered wrapping kineticjs, but decided not too, because well what fun > would that be. This is also a side project to something else I am working on > which is a gui for working with data sets. I intend to build a widgeting > system with it. I could have just done that on top of kineticjs but again > what fun would that be. I can always swap something like kineticjs back into > it if it doesn't work out or it becomes to much work. I don't need all the > functionality of kineticjs at the moment though.
I see potential benefits in using features like layering, fonts, animation etc. Either way nice job, the code looks nice and clean to me eyes at a quick glance. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
