You're right. You're also nearly omni-present. 2 min response? That's great.

Thanks.

On Friday, January 31, 2014 12:30:03 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
> Tutorial has already been updated for 0.3.1.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:28 PM, William Sommers <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I noticed that om.core/join was pulled out yesterday. Trying to reason about 
> what to do next on the tutorial and how to correct it. Just wanted to give an 
> FYI.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:27:47 AM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
> 
> > Yep, I'll keep playing around with om.core/join and see if we can make it 
> > worthwhile.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > David
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Ruslan Prokopchuk <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> > David, thanks for reply. I like idea of om.core/join and vote for it if one 
> > will not complicate things. Because in my current project I have some 
> > global app options which could be changed and are used in several places of 
> > component hierarchy. I know, it is cheap to merge them to components' props 
> > passing down render tree, but it is annoying to do by hand in many places, 
> > and I like possibility to make join in any subcomponent and to be sure that 
> > it will be updated properly. But I don't know how join with such behavior 
> > will complicate om or create danger for consistency.
> 
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > > Your intuitions are correct. om.core/get-shared and om.core/join are not 
> > > really related at all. om.core/get-shared is about accessing data global 
> > > to an entire render tree that will never change. om.core/join is very 
> > > experimental, I'm not sure what this functionality should look like yet. 
> > > The idea is that you can compose component data out of smaller pieces of 
> > > data in the application state.
> 
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > --
> 
> >
> 
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> 
> >
> 
> > ---
> 
> >
> 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "ClojureScript" group.
> 
> >
> 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected].
> 
> >
> 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> 
> ---
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to