It will be triggered with swap! as well. However unless you have a really, really good reason you should stick with transact! and update! Using swap! directly in the future will likely opt you out of many Om optimizations.
David On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:54 AM, faenvie <[email protected]> wrote: > > No particular reason. That example was used to track down a previous bug. > > So the only additional implication using transact! or update! is, that an > Om re-render will be triggered. Right ? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
