Joel, Not necessarily. When you have the timeline history as a series of immutable values you have quite a few options that don't involve the command pattern.
Collaborative updates could be merged into the users's app state timeline, leaving the user's undo steps completely untouched while respecting the global change dictated by the server. David On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Joel <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm curious on the Om-sync future as far as bidirectional is concerned. > You get collaborative changes, so if you go to do an undo you want to undo > your own not necessarily the last one (from someone else). It seems > eventually you end up with a command pattern anyway? > > J > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
