On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:37:59 PM UTC-5, David Nolen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Colin Kahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > I know you're busy, but could you elaborate a bit more? I would assume at > some point you would need to construct a path of some sort since that seems > to work best with om/transact!. The other alternative I could see is > structuring the data in a more flat way, where the deps vector is just ids > pointing to other items (that would eliminate the need for recursively > traversing the tree to find the matching id). > > > > > Thanks > > > Yes, sorry, this is exactly what I was trying to suggest. Then you don't need > to bother with paths. > > > As a general rule, I would avoid storing and manipulating paths. About the > only place where I've found this to be acceptable is consumers of :tx-listen. > > > > David
That is actually a really good thing to know. Didn't consider the structure before. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
