Om components cannot be constructed with the same convention as React DOM components. So we tradeoff uniformity for the capability of intercepting all component construction calls - which IMO is far more useful property for a UI toolkit. For more details - http://swannodette.github.io/2014/02/27/taking-off-the-blindfold/.
David On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jonas Enlund <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 9:15:09 PM UTC+2, Leon Talbot wrote: > > Why would I choose one or the other? > > > > Thanks! > > If I read the sablono README[1] correctly you can't currently write an Om > component and use it with sablonos hiccup syntax. Only pre-defined html > tags are supported. Is this correct? > > [1] https://github.com/r0man/sablono#html-tags > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
