This is not an interesting benchmark for Mori. We try our best for small data structures but different engines have different characteristics - but overall we perform quite well in the small case.
Now wry some medium to large data structures, Mori will absolutely demolish Lo-dash. David On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Leonardo Borges < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there a mori mailing list? I'm happy to post this there if it does. > > I was doing some benchmarking on my Mac of a few simple operations > using lodah's cloneDeep function and mori. > > The results in Chrome were great. mori is only marginally slower than > the lowdash equivalent. > > When running the benchmark on Safari however things were *very* difference. > > First, for some reason, Safari is *way* faster than Chrome in my machine. > Secondly, mori's performance seems so be much worse in Safari. > > I might be missing something here but I was surprised by the results. > The benchmark is on jsperf: > http://jsperf.com/lodash-deep-cloning-vs-mori > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > Leonardo Borges > www.leonardoborges.com > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
