On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Scott Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks David. I'll keep my eye on that issue. > > Debouncing sounds like a good idea for reducing the number of renders. > I'm solving a similar issue in another part of the app by debouncing the > channel containing the updates: > https://github.com/scttnlsn/jot/blob/master/src/jot/ui.cljs#L141 > > Perhaps this isn't even worth worrying about until there's a noticeable > performance problem. Is this why you're on the fence about some sort of > "silent" update? I'm more concerned that people will abuse such a feature. I'd rather that Om components maintain a fairly direct correspondence between state and what the user sees. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
