Wow. That looks really interesting. It also looks like a lot of code :-) Is 
there any introductory documentation/blog posts that might help me distill the 
“essence”? 

--
paul.butcher->msgCount++

Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park...
Who says I have a one track mind?

http://www.paulbutcher.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher
Skype: paulrabutcher

Author of Seven Concurrency Models in Seven Weeks: When Threads Unravel
http://pragprog.com/book/pb7con

On 22 April 2014 at 14:48:47, deliminator ([email protected]) wrote:

In the aloha project we are experimenting with new ways to deal with the 
contentEditable problem that you may find interesting:  

* state-based, serializable, replayable change tracking for contentEditable (as 
opposed to command-based the way it is usually done) using MutationObservers 
where available: 
https://github.com/alohaeditor/Aloha-Editor/blob/howling-mad/src/undo.js  

* React-like virtual-DOM, where a javascript-object tree can be updated without 
actually touching the DOM (in a referentially-transparent and optionally lazy 
fashion), and coupled with a very simple difference algorithm can be used to 
update the dom with a single function call: 
https://github.com/alohaeditor/Aloha-Editor/blob/howling-mad/src/boromir.js  

On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 12:58:38 PM UTC+2, Paul Butcher wrote:  
> After working my way through the various samples and tutorials out there, I’m 
> about to start on my first Om app (yay!).  
>  
>  
> Possibly foolishly, I’m planning to make heavy use of contentEditable. In 
> essence, what I need to do is replicate something similar to Word’s “track 
> changes” functionality. Ideally, I’d like to get this to play nicely with 
> Om’s undo - the complication being that as well as changes made by the app, 
> I’d also need to undo changes made by the user (ideally wrapping changes made 
> by both into a single logical undo).  
>  
>  
> I’ve done quite a bit of searching, and getting React to play nicely with 
> contentEditable seems to be a largely unexplored area? Chas Emerick’s message 
> on the React mailing list seems to capture the current state of the art:  
>  
>  
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reactjs/ff5YlPKiqmc/ngDTsk_i2mYJ  
>  
>  
> Although this looks promising:  
>  
>  
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/22678516/268371  
>  
>  
> Is there anything else that I should be aware of? Any words of wisdom or 
> advice before I dive into this (including “don’t use Om for this - it’s the 
> wrong tool for the job” :-)?  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> paul.butcher->msgCount++  
>  
> Silverstone, Brands Hatch, Donington Park...  
> Who says I have a one track mind?  
>  
> http://www.paulbutcher.com/  
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher  
> Skype: paulrabutcher  
>  
>  
> Author of Seven Concurrency Models in Seven Weeks: When Threads Unravel  
> http://pragprog.com/book/pb7con  

--  
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.  
---  
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.  
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].  
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].  
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.  

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to