CLJX-ing this sounds hard. Clj-time is less CLJ and more Joda.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Joel Holdbrooks <[email protected]>wrote: > It would be mega awesome if this clj-time was just a CLJX project so we > could just depend on one library instead of two. Have you thought about > asking the maintainers of clj-time their thoughts wrt to that? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
