This is definitely true today.

But I've been inspired by DataScript to tease things apart just a little
bit more. In the near future I would like to see a better integration story
for DataScript (or something like it) with minimal effect (ideally none) on
code that relies on cursors.

David


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:

> The reasoning is that if you interact with the app-state atom directly,
> you lose out on modification of sub-parts through cursor and on the
> :tx-listen machinery.
>
> Beyond that,  I don't know and David will have to go through his reasoning
> though.
>
>
> On 5 May 2014 14:24, Roger Gilliar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like I hack, but a useful one ;-)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>
>
>  --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to