http://facebook.github.io/react/docs/component-api.html. Remember `owner`
is a real React instance.

David


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Roman Scherer <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> thanks for the confirmation. Is there a way I can detect if the
> component is mounted? I first tried adding a :mounted? flag to
> component state and set/change it in will-mount and
> will-unmount. But I get the same error when I call om/set-state!
> in will-unmount.
>
> Roman
>
> On Monday, May 5, 2014 11:43:33 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote:
> > Setting up go blocks in mount/unmount is fine in my opinion, but yes,
> you must handle the concurrency issues that arise from doing this.
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Roman Scherer <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I think I'm running into a race condition while using om and
> >
> > core.async. I have code like this:
> >
> >
> >
> >     om/IWillMount
> >
> >     (will-mount [this]
> >
> >       (go (let [image (<! (load-image (om/get-state owner :url)))]
> >
> >             (om/set-state! owner :width (:width image))
> >
> >             (om/set-state! owner :height (:height image)))))
> >
> >
> >
> > The load-image fn returns a channel. Then I do a blocking read on
> >
> > that channel and at some point later, it returns a map which I
> >
> > save to the component's local state.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mounting, unmounting and remounting works fine with one
> >
> > component. However, when I have more than one instances of this
> >
> > component and I remount them I get most of the time the following
> >
> > error.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Uncaught Error: Invariant Violation: forceUpdate(...): Can
> >
> >     only force an update on mounted or mounting components.
> >
> >
> >
> > This looks like the calls to om/set-state! within the go block
> >
> > are sometimes called when the component is already unmounted.
> >
> >
> >
> > Now I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong and have some
> >
> > questions.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Is it bad style to use go blocks in the will-mount/did-mount fn
> >
> > and set state in them?
> >
> >
> >
> > * Do other people have similar issues, and how to work around?
> >
> >
> >
> > * Any other idea what's going on?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Roman.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "ClojureScript" group.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to