On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Christian Johansen <[email protected]
> wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> > As with the previous point this falls out the fact that we just use
> React DOM components directly. I'm not just not interested in providing
> something different over React's DOM bits.
>
> That makes sense. What is somewhat surprising is that
>
> React.DOM.h1({}, "Many", "words"); and
> React.DOM.h1({}, ["Many", "word"]); both work, whereas
>
> (om.dom/h1 #js {} "Many" "words") works, but
> (om.dom/h1 #js {} ["Many" "words"]) does not
>
(om.dom/h1 #js {} #js ["Many" "words"])
is what you want. React doesn't know about ClojureScript vectors.
> > On a related note, the build/build-all differences seem unnecessary to
> me, and personally, I would prefer a polymorphic build for the same reasons.
> >
> > This is mostly because of argument order issues. I don't feel strongly
> about it and no one has proposed how they might be unified.
>
> build has [f cursor m] and build-all has [f xs m]. Is it possible to tell
> a list of cursors from a cursor that is a list?
This is undesirable, components that don't update application state don't
actually need to take cursors.
David
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
