On 05/19/2014 02:03 PM, Wes Brown wrote:
IMO as a community member
+ It would mirror current clojurescript's usage of gclosure as a post-processor
- clojurescript's build process is complex as it is, adding a pre-processor
won't help that
- cljx isn't contrib (k.o. in and of itself, would have to be side-stepped by
creating a contrib or adding cljx to clojurescript)
I didn't realize cljx wasn't contrib, or what the implications of that are.
The light becomes illuminated over my head.
Right, cljx is an independent project (@
http://github.com/lynaghk/cljx). To further clarify, cljx is never going
to be part of contrib (based on feedback I've received from members of
the Clojure core team).
I am also quite keen on some variant of cljs-in-cljs, but the path to it
cannot include cljx (presuming a desire to have the work in question be
acceptable upstream).
- Chas
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
