On Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:37:33 UTC+2, Colin Fleming wrote: > Well, implementing symbol resolution is a pretty huge task. I'd estimate it > accounts for at least 60% of the time I spend working on Cursive. Cursive's > implementation isn't open source, but even if it were it's very tied to the > IntelliJ infrastructure and wouldn't be very useful. Cursive is internally > structured around an extension API which I'm going to open source along with > the current implementations so in theory those implementations could be used > with another core indexing engine implementing the same API, but like I say > it's a pretty enormous task. You'll need a good indexing engine which is much > harder than it sounds - the one in IntelliJ is really amazing, you definitely > don't want to develop that yourself if you can avoid it. > > > > In general, I think it's extremely difficult to retrofit this sort of system > into an editor such as LightTable that wasn't designed to use it from the > start. IntelliJ's indexing is fundamentally integrated into the > infrastructure, it's not something that you could easily bolt on with a > plugin. > > > > > > > On 4 June 2014 02:17, Andrea Richiardi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [CUT]
Gotcha! Thanks for the advice, I'll have a look and probably ask on LightTable's irc channel...but I doubt that a Clojure newbie can tackle this alone (ok...if he can, he will spend a lot of time :)). -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
