No, changing the behavior of get-in will most definitely break existing code. You can of course supply your own version of get-in that does what you want.
David On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Roger Gilliar <[email protected]> wrote: > I found the problem; > > i passed the following cursor: > > (om/build user-list/component (get-in app-state [:selected-domain :services > (:select-service-index state) :users]))) > > The error was that I should have written :selected-service-index instead of > :select-service-index. > > What have tricked me is the fact that the table with data was rendered. > Would it make sense to throw an error if a key in the key list is nil ? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
