I think until it is markup the disconnect is far too removed to be practical. I think we need jsx or nothing
On Sunday, June 22, 2014, Creighton Kirkendall <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul, > I am not sure I understand what you are looking for. Maybe you could give > some examples what your thinking. Currently, Sablano and Kioo try to bridge > the gap between html and react/om. Sablano is the closest to jsx, in that > it mixes the presentation directly with the component definition. It uses > clojure data structures to represent html vs html strings but feels very > similar to jsx once you get the hang of the syntax. Kioo takes a different > route and tries to completely separate the html from the logic of the > component. If you are looking for embedding html into clojure like jsx > does with javascript it doesn't exist "yet". I can think of several ways > to accomplish this but not sure how I feel about the idea. > > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:;>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:;>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Cheers Paul Cowan Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland) blog: http://thesoftwaresimpleton.com/ website: http://www.cuttingedgesolutionsscotland.com/ -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
