That is the case that I've seen most often Gary. 

On Sunday, June 22, 2014 9:24:32 AM UTC-4, Gary Trakhman wrote:
> Let's also not forget that JS is single-threaded.  I'm guessing all the 
> components will be recursively mounted before the contents of the go block 
> can do anything at all.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Della Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> 
> 
> We ended up doing exactly the sort of thing you describe.  We have a go
> 
> block inside IWillMount, listening for messages from the server (in our
> 
> case via browserchannel, but exact same idea).  Inside this go block we
> 
> apply updates from our server by calling transact! on the app data.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Since the block is asynchronous, couldn't the Om protocol (whichever
> 
> > one is best) return before the go block actually does anything? Or
> 
> > what happens when the go block does something at a different time
> 
> > than the Om protocol is getting called?
> 
> 
> 
> componentWillMount (a.k.a. IWillMount in Om) is called once at the very
> 
> beginning of the React lifecycle
> 
> (http://facebook.github.io/react/docs/component-specs.html#mounting-componentwillmount),
> 
> so it's not going to cause the kind of strange behavior you're concerned
> 
> about.  If a message comes in and transact! gets called, an update will
> 
> be scheduled and rendering will happening as expected.
> 
> 
> 
> DD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (2014/06/22 21:24), Andrew Stoeckley wrote:
> 
> > I was reading this thread:
> 
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/clojurescript/V5J1Rf0k84M/JgspX_AyoGgJ
> 
> >
> 
> >  It was suggested that all state changes to the Om atom should occur
> 
> > within an Om component. Currently I am swap!ing outside Om.
> 
> >
> 
> > A lot of my state changes are the result of an infinite <! loop
> 
> > inside a go block, which is reading a websocket. What happens if I
> 
> > put this inside an Om component, and where is the best place to do
> 
> > so? IWillMount?
> 
> >
> 
> > Since the block is asynchronous, couldn't the Om protocol (whichever
> 
> > one is best) return before the go block actually does anything? Or
> 
> > what happens when the go block does something at a different time
> 
> > than the Om protocol is getting called?
> 
> >
> 
> > Or perhaps more likely there is a better way. Any suggestions on good
> 
> > approach here are appreciated.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> 
> ---
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> 
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to