On Friday, June 20, 2014 10:29:38 AM UTC-4, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > I discovered that along with Om, there are Reagent and Quiescence. > > Has anyone worked with the latter alternatives, and how might I decide what > the tradeoffs are for using each of them?
So tell me if this is accurate.... In a nutshell: 1. Reagent has the simplest approach, with just the 'render' function for React.js components, and a ratom (possibly one per component) for state. 2. Quiescent has a few more React.js functions for components, and components have state in one atom shared between them all. 3. Om has the most functions/interfaces for components, providing maximum flexibility, but each component automagically manages its own state based on cursors into global app state and additional functions are provided for updating that state, rather than using clojurescript's built-in functions (swap!, reset!, etc.). Is this close? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
