On Saturday, January 25, 2014 11:38:14 PM UTC+8, David Nolen wrote: > > If I was to describe the difference between Om and Reagent it would be that > Om is draconian about component modularity in order to encourage component > reuse. Directly manipulating the app state from a component in Om is a > anti-pattern.
Can I get a bit of clarification on this: The above suggests an anti-pattern but isn't the idea that app state be manipulated using om/update! or om/transact! both of which must be called inside a component function? Or are you suggesting that it is the passing of the entire app-state to a component rather than a specific cursor that is the anti-pattern? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
