I've heard good things about om-tools, I just hadn't checked it out yet
(and it only took about 2 minutes(!)).  Those little improvement are kind
of nice - thanks for the heads up.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Daniel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Its because Om isn't built to work on sequences directly (I guess because
> React doesn't? I remember seeing somewhere that dom/* is a very thin
> wrapper over react functions). You may be interested in om-tools, which
> DOES allow you to pass sequences to the dom functions:
> https://github.com/Prismatic/om-tools/#dom-tools
>
>
> On 17 August 2014 23:55, Ryan Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah  : /
>>
>> Why require the use of 'apply' over simply wrapping a sequence of Om
>> components with e.g. (dom/div ...)?  One of those things in Om that doesn't
>> make sense to me.
>>
>> Thank you for the help.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:05 PM, jack james <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:22:53 PM UTC-5, Ryan Waters wrote:
>>> > The following does not render a vector of numbers like I would expect
>>> - what (assuredly) simple thing am I missing?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > (def app-state
>>> >   (atom
>>> >     {:items (vec (range 10))}))
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > (defn subcomponent [item owner]
>>> >   (reify
>>> >     om/IRender
>>> >     (render [_]
>>> >       (dom/div nil item))))
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > (defn component [app owner]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >   (reify
>>> >     om/IRender
>>> >     (render [_]
>>> >       (dom/div nil
>>> >         (om/build-all subcomponent (:items app))))))
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > (om/root component app-state
>>> >   {:target (. js/document (getElementById "app"))})
>>>
>>> looks like you missed an "apply":
>>>
>>> ...
>>>        (apply dom/div nil
>>>          (om/build-all ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "ClojureScript" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>
>
>  --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to