Sounds good, thank you. Of course I agree, that using dots (like in "(js/console.log x)") is faster to write.
W dniu czwartek, 28 sierpnia 2014 23:45:55 UTC+2 użytkownik Francis Avila napisał: > Avoid dots in the name part of symbols. "js/a.b.c" works to reference "a.b.c" > by value (i.e. without calling it), but it's not idiomatic. Prefer (.. js/a > -b -c), or using your examples: > > (.. js/Foo -Bar -Foo2 -myProperty) > (.. js/Foo -Bar -Foo2 myMethod) > > The "js" pseudo-namespace is special because it emits the symbol as normal js > property access, but if it were a *real* namespace there would be no dotted > symbols in it. (That said, I cheat all the time e.g. with "(js/console.log > x)".) > > > > On Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:22:53 PM UTC-5, Rafal Spacjer wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I' curious what is a preferable way of accessing properties or methods in > > nested JavaScript "namespaces". > > > > Lets assume that external library define such property: > > > > Foo.Bar.Foo2.myProperty in global namespace. > > > > what is idiomatic way of accessing 'myProperty': > > > > (.-myProperty js/Foo.Bar.Foo2) > > > > or > > > > (.. js/Foo -Bar -Foo2 -myProperty) > > > > Same question for a method, if we have such statement: > > > > Foo.Bar.Foo2.myMethod(); > > > > how should we invoke 'myMethod'? Is this correct: (.myMethod > > js/Foo.Bar.Foo2) ? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
