Bit of a sidenote, but now that the libraries are getting more mature, It'd be great to see some complex-ish apps (say, Omchaya-size or larger, but maybe even CircleCI's frontend https://github.com/circleci/frontend) for a side-by-side comparison + speed benchmarks, to get a sense of the tradeoffs as apps scale out. I'm personally curious about whether Reagent's ease of use comes with a cost at some point.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[email protected]> wrote: > On my project, I was using data in the form of a recursive tree--an > editable one. I got stuck somewhere WRT to this in Reagent. (I wrote a > question to the original developer, but he never replied.) For my purposes, > Om's cursors made handling data updates trivial, so it was a big win. > However, I'm sure I've put a lot more man hours in the UI development with > Om than I would have with Reagent. > > So in the end, the fact that I had a recursive tree of data to work with > gave Om the edge, otherwise I would have used Reagent. > > I also had a look at Quiescent, but it was too thin a layer over React for > what I'm doing. > > Ideally, we'd have Reagent's UI simplicity combined with Om's wonderful > app data handling. > > Jamie > > > On Sep 10, 2014, at 10:11 PM, Dmitri Sotnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I actually found Reagent's data handling to be very flexible. It' makes > it easy to create local states for components as well as managing the > global state using a global state atom. I'd be curious to hear what > limitations others have run into and how they could be addressed. > > > > On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:40:13 AM UTC-4, Jamie Orchard-Hays > wrote: > >> I'm curious as well. I started with Reagent, but switched to Om/Sablono > after finding Reagent's app data handling too limited for what I needed. > The trade-off is much more to think about (complexity) when writing Om > components. > >> > >> > >> Jamie > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:51 AM, Daniel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> My apologies for an off topic post in this thread - we can take it off > list or to a separate thread if it needs more than a simple reply - > especially since the library looks really good! > >> Sean could you write a little about why you switched away from Om? > >> I'm just trying to get a better understanding of what pros and cons Om > and Reagent have and why Reagent is a better fit for your specific use > case. I've seen a few people switching lately so I'm interested in hearing > people's thoughts. > >> > >> On 9 Sep 2014 01:01, "Sean Corfield" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That looks great Dmitri! We've just made the switch from Om/Sablono to > Reagent so this will be very handy for us I expect. > >> > >> > >> > >> Sean > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sep 8, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Dmitri Sotnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> The goal of the library is to automate the process of binding form > elements to a document represented by a map in a Reagent atom. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/yogthos/reagent-forms > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Feedback and contributions are welcome. :) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > >> > >> --- > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > > > -- > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
